Contractor Management — 7 min
Global HR — 7 min
Organizational structure is the backbone of any business. It shapes the way tasks are managed and how teams communicate. But how do you choose the right organizational structure for your business?
In this article, we’ll break down the four main types of organizational structure, their pros and cons, and how you can determine which is best suited for your company.
An organizational structure defines how activities are directed within a company. This includes how roles and responsibilities are assigned, how communication flows, and how different parts of the business are connected. Whether you're a small startup or a multinational corporation, having a clear structure helps you streamline operations, reduce confusion, and align teams toward common goals.
Your company's organizational structure influences everything — from how quickly decisions are made to how engaged employees feel. The right structure can lead to increased productivity, better communication, and greater overall efficiency. On the flip side, the wrong structure can lead to slow decision-making, poor communication, and reduced morale.
There are many ways to organize a company, but most structures fall into one of four categories: functional, divisional, matrix, and flatarchy. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the right one for your business depends on factors like your company’s size, goals, and industry.
A functional structure organizes a company based on departments or functions — like marketing, sales, finance, or human resources. This is one of the most traditional structures and is widely used in both large corporations and smaller businesses.
Pro: A functional structure clearly shows team functions according to their specialty. Employees can focus on their specific job with expertise and efficiency. Departments are managed independently, with clear lines of authority and responsibility.
Cons: This structure can lead to silos, where departments become isolated from one another. Communication across departments can be limited, and collaboration may suffer.
A functional structure is best for companies that need specialization, such as larger organizations with clearly defined roles.
A divisional structure organizes teams based on products, markets, or geographic locations. This structure allows each division to operate independently, focusing on a specific product or market.
Pros: Flexibility is a key advantage of divisional structures. Each division can respond quickly to the unique needs of its market or product line. This structure also fosters accountability since each division operates as its own mini-business.
Cons: A divisional structure can be resource-intensive, calling for the same role across divisions. This can lead to inefficiencies if departments don't coordinate well.
A divisional structure is best for large organizations with multiple product lines or those operating in various geographic regions.
A matrix structure is a hybrid of the functional and divisional structures. Employees report to more than one manager — typically both a functional manager and a product or project manager. This creates a grid-like structure where teams can work cross-functionally.
Pros: A matrix structure promotes better collaboration and flexibility. Employees can work on different projects or products while still reporting to their functional departments.
Cons: The main challenge of a matrix structure is complexity. Employees can have conflicting demands from different managers, which can lead to confusion and inefficiencies.
A matrix structure is best for organizations that need to encourage collaboration across different departments or have multiple simultaneous projects.
A flatarchy structure is a mix of flat and hierarchical models. It’s often seen in startups or innovative companies where decision-making needs to be fast and employees are given more autonomy.
Pros: The biggest advantage of a flatarchy structure is agility. Without many layers of management, decisions are made quickly, and employees have more freedom to innovate and take initiative.
Cons: This structure can lead to disorder if not managed properly. Without clear leadership, teams may struggle with decision-making and accountability.
A flatarchy structure is best for startups or companies that value speed and innovation over a formal hierarchy.
Now that we’ve covered the main types of structures, let’s explore how these are visualized through organizational charts. Organizational charts are useful tools to represent the structure of your company and clarify reporting lines and communication flows.
There are a few common types of organizational charts:
The most traditional type, a hierarchical chart shows a top-down structure with clear lines of authority from leadership to employees.
This chart reflects divisions by product, market, or geography, showing how different divisions operate semi-independently.
A matrix chart shows employees reporting to multiple managers, representing the cross-functional relationships within the organization.
A flat chart represents a less formal organization. This chart depicts a more horizontal structure with fewer layers of management.
Organizational charts help employees visualize their place in the company, understand reporting relationships, and improve overall communication.
Choosing the right structure for your company requires a clear understanding of your business needs. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you make the best decision.
Are you a small startup or a large, established company? Larger companies tend to benefit from a more formal, functional or divisional structure, while smaller companies might prefer the agility of a flatarchy.
Are you focused on innovation and fast decision-making, or do you prioritize stability and clear chains of command? Innovative companies often lean toward matrix or flatarchy structures, while stability-focused companies may prefer functional or divisional setups.
Does your business require high levels of collaboration between departments, or is it more beneficial to have distinct teams? If collaboration is key, a matrix structure might be the best choice.
Complex hierarchies can slow down decision-making and information flow. If speed is crucial, consider a flatter structure. If clear reporting lines are more important, stick with a hierarchical model.
As your company grows, your structure may need to evolve. Flexibility is key to adapting to new challenges and opportunities.
Remote work often requires flatter hierarchies, with more flexible roles and communication processes. Clear communication channels and collaboration tools help remote teams function effectively within the structure.
In a hybrid model, balancing in-office and remote employees adds complexity to how teams are managed. Companies may need to rethink traditional structures to ensure transparency, accountability, and inclusivity across both remote and in-office teams.
The right organizational structure can unlock your company’s potential. Whether you’re drawn to the efficiency of a functional structure, the flexibility of a divisional one, or the agility of a flatarchy, it’s important to assess your company’s unique needs. Keep in mind that as your company grows and changes, your structure may need to evolve as well.
To see how the global workforce is evolving, get the 2024 Global Workforce Report from Remote. Find out what's shaping the future of global work with insights from HR leaders, so you can structure your organization accordingly.
Get the 2024 Global Workforce Report today to find the best organizational structure for your global team.
Subscribe to receive the latest
Remote blog posts and updates in your inbox.
Contractor Management — 7 min
Global HR — 4 min
Tax and Compliance — 8 min
Global Payroll — 6 min