What is life-work balance & why will it matter in 2025?
We avoid the conventional label “work-life balance”, because we see it as inverted both literally and conceptually. Our preferred phrasing, life-work balance, emphasises that life should come first, and that work ought to exist to enrich rather than overshadow it. Life-work balance is not merely a tally of the hours someone spends at work or the time left for personal pursuits. It is more nuanced than that. That is why our study aims to provide a rounded perspective of what it truly means to live and work well across different parts of the world. Naturally, we recognise that life-work balance has no single universal definition — it will mean different things to different people and cultures. Our objective is not to generalise, but to outline the key statutory benefits and workplace systems around the world that help foster a strong life-work balance. Across the globe, life-work balance remains fundamental to our physical and emotional wellbeing. Everyone should have the time and the freedom to take part meaningfully in life outside of work.
“By promoting life-work balance, we acknowledge that work is a means to support life and not its defining purpose. At Remote, our Global Life-Work Balance study is more than just a comparative table. It’s a reflection of our core belief that people perform their best when they’re trusted to live fully outside of work, not just within it. We advocate for life-work balance because flexibility and wellbeing are more than just perks. Our mission is to build a future where global talent thrives not just professionally, but personally too.” — Barbara Matthews, Chief People Officer
Why life-work balance matters more than ever
For the first time, life-work balance has become the number-one motivator for employees worldwide, with workplace flexibility outranking salary in importance in a recent survey of thousands of international workers.
Why is life-work balance becoming non-negotiable in today’s working landscape?
Employees demand flexibility. In our recent Remote Workforce Report, 73% of hiring leaders reported losing staff to organisations that offer greater flexibility.
The boundaries are blurred. The widespread take-up of hybrid and remote work brings many benefits, but it can make it harder for employees to ‘disconnect.’
We live in an always-on culture. Technology has expanded our horizons, yet expectations for 24/7 responsiveness have risen.
Economic uncertainty is widespread. Amid rising costs of living worldwide, many employees are working longer hours to remain relevant and retain job security.
Parental demands are taking a toll. Almost three-quarters of the global workforce have some kind of caregiving responsibility to juggle alongside their careers.
AI has introduced additional stress. While AI can boost how efficiently we work, it also heightens fears of redundancy and creates pressure to keep updating skills.
Our study shows that countries such as New Zealand and many across Europe are supporting employees to manage the balance between life and work through employee-first policies, whereas nations like the United States risk facing a burnout epidemic because of cultures that continue to prioritise long hours and limited paid leave.
Without decisive action, this approach will drain the talent pool and compromise the future resilience of the workforce.
Life-work balance index survey methodology
Recognised as global authorities in HR and employment, we analysed index data for the world’s top 60 GDP countries to identify which jurisdiction delivers the strongest life-work balance for employees. The top 60 GDP countries were chosen as the study’s global sample. The study examined the following indicators:
Statutory annual leave (total days of paid leave, including public holidays)*
Minimum statutory sick pay (percent of wage, or a flat amount)*
Statutory maternity leave (weeks paid)*
Statutory maternity leave payment rate (percent of wage)*
Minimum wage (USD per hour)*
Healthcare status
Happiness index score (1–10, 10 being highest)
Average hours per week per employed person
LGBTQ+ inclusivity (0–100, 100 being highest; the Legal Index reflects the legal rights and freedoms LGBTQ+ people have, while the Public Opinion Index measures general public sentiment in each region)
Safety: Global Peace Index (1–4, lower is better)
The aim was to portray each country’s life-work balance accurately, reframing the familiar “work‑life balance” concept to emphasise how employers in each jurisdiction safeguard employees’ lives and place life ahead of work.
We applied index weights to the metrics to indicate their relative importance, producing an overall score out of 100 for each country. All indicators are ranked from highest to lowest, except the healthcare rating — which is scored out of five (one is best) — and both average weekly hours worked and the safety score, which are ranked from lowest to highest.
The data were pulled and analysed on 1 April 2025.
(*) Where a range was provided, the minimum value was recorded.