Remote versus Oyster HR

Remote: global HR that goes beyond the basics

If hiring overseas feels beyond the scope of entry-level tools, then choose Remote for a market-leading expert partner that knows the landscape and delivers specialised, end-to-end HR solutions.

g2-mid-market-level-visual (Oyster)

Companies around the world grow with Remote

0%

30% reduction in hiring time with Remote EOR

0%

12% rise in operational efficiency using Remote Payroll

0 weeks

Onboarding is 2 weeks quicker with Remote Contractor Management

0%

43% better regulatory compliance when using Remote

Which is a better fit for your business: Remote or Oyster?

Looking for a global HR solution? OysterHR focuses on EOR and its additional features are quite limited. By contrast, Remote’s advanced suite of global employment tools gives you everything you need to build an international team.

End-to-end HR suite

End-to-end HR suite

Remote combines advanced employee management, payroll, and contractor management solutions.

EOR-centric solution

EOR-centric solution

Oyster offers a solid EOR product, but its payroll and contractor management features are more limited in scope.

100% owned entity infrastructure

100% owned entity infrastructure

Remote manages all global entities in-house, with no third-party outsourcing.

Mixed ownership model

Mixed ownership model

Oyster operates using a mix of third-party vendors and owned entities.

Consistent global support experience

Consistent global support experience

Remote’s in-country expertise means specialist support in every country we operate in.

Third-party support providers

Third-party support providers

Oyster HR offers in-house support where they operate local entities, but uses external providers in others.

A word from our customers

Join customers who rely on Remote to transform their business.

With Remote, the world is effectively your Oyster

Comprehensive advanced global HR solutions

Relative to Oyster’s feature set, Remote supplies a full solution backed by industry-leading expertise and dedicated support.

Fair, transparent pricing

Remote’s fair price guarantee means there are no hidden fees and no upfront deposits, so you’ll never shell out ffor anything unexpected.

100% ownership and operation of all entities

Unlike Oyster, we operate every global entity in-house to maximise compliance and reduce risk.

Key features compared: Remote and Oyster

100% ownership and operation of all entities

At Remote, we don’t work with any third-parties to outsource services or manage entities — ensuring one consistent, global experience.

No upfront deposits by default

Remote only requests reserves when absolutelynecessary, so you can maximizeyour cash flow.

Unlimited indemnity coverage

With Remote’s third-party indemnity coverage, you’re fully protected when using our services.

Dedicated CSM for every customer

Every one of Remote’s EOR customers gets access to their own dedicated support.

Dedicated mobile app

Remote users describe the in-built employee mobile app as “a great plus”, allowing seamless expense management, time-off tracking, and more.

Equity tools to issue grants to your team

Remote is the only global HR platform which allows companies to issue equity to their team members.

Built-in tools for simplified global hiring

Remote Recruit's powerful sourcing tools and real-time talent insights to help you find top talent quickly.

Compare with other platforms

Oyster’s EOR solution covers the entry-level requirements of global hiring, but their payroll and contractor management offerings are more restricted in scope and capability. For the complexities of global employment, you need a trusted partner.

  • A single hub to manage your entire global team

  • Streamlined payroll and expense management for each employee

  • Contractor management services across 200+ countries and territories

Oyster vs Remote FAQs

Remote provides clear, no-nonsense pricing — billed annually, you pay $699 USD per employee per month. Contractor management is A$44 per contractor. fair price guarantee, while Oyster may add fees for services like benefits administration and often uses third-party entities in many countries, which can lead to extra charges.