What is life-work balance & why does it matter in 2025?
We move away from the traditional term “work-life balance” because it places work first; our preferred phrase, life-work balance, puts life ahead and insists work should support and enrich it rather than overwhelm it. Life-work balance is not merely a tally of hours spent working versus hours free. It is more complex, which is why our study aims to provide a rounded perspective on what living and working well looks like across different regions. We also recognise that life-work balance has no single global definition — it varies by individual and culture. Our objective is not to generalise, but to outline the statutory benefits and workplace systems that support a healthy life-work balance worldwide. Around the world, life-work balance remains central to physical and mental wellbeing. Everyone should have the time and freedom to engage meaningfully with life outside of work.
“Supporting life-work balance recognises that work should enable life rather than define it. At Remote, our Global Life-Work Balance study goes beyond a simple comparison chart; it reflects our fundamental belief that people do their best when they are trusted to lead full lives outside of work as well as within it. We promote life-work balance because flexibility and wellbeing are essential, not merely optional benefits. Our goal is to shape a future where global talent flourishes both professionally and personally.” — Barbara Matthews, Chief People Officer
Why life-work balance is more essential than ever
For the first time, life-work balance is now considered the number-one motivator for employees all over the world, with workplace flexibility outranking salary in importance in a recent survey of thousands of international workers.
However, why has life-work balance become a non-negotiable feature of the contemporary workplace?
Employees expect flexibility. In our latest Remote Workforce Report, 73% of hiring leaders reported losing employees to organisations that offered greater flexibility.
The boundaries are increasingly blurred. The broad shift to hybrid and remote working brings many advantages, but it can make it harder for employees to ‘disconnect.’
We live in an always-on culture. Technology has expanded our possibilities, yet expectations for 24/7 responsiveness have grown.
Economic uncertainty is pervasive. Amid rising costs of living worldwide, many employees are working longer hours to remain relevant and secure in their roles.
Parental responsibilities are taking a toll. Almost three-quarters of the global workforce have some form of caregiving duty to balance alongside a career.
AI has added extra pressure. While AI can help us work more efficiently, it also heightens concerns about redundancy and the need for ongoing skills development.
As our analysis shows, countries such as New Zealand and many in Europe are supporting employees with policies that prioritise life, whereas nations like the United States risk increased burnout due to cultures that still favour long hours and limited paid leave.
Without decisive action, this trajectory will drain talent and weaken the workforce’s long-term resilience.
Survey methodology for the Life-Work Balance Index
As a global HR and employment authority, we analysed index data from the world's 60 largest economies by GDP to identify which countries offer employees the strongest life-work balance. The study assessed the following indicators:
Statutory annual leave (total paid days of leave, including public holidays)*
Minimum statutory sick pay (percentage of wage, or a flat amount)*
Statutory maternity leave (number of paid weeks)*
Statutory maternity leave payment rate (percentage of wage)*
Minimum wage (USD per hour)*
Healthcare status
Happiness index score (1–10, 10 being highest)
Average hours worked per week per employed person
LGBTQ+ inclusivity (0-100, 100 being highest — reflects legal rights and public opinion)
Safety: Global Peace Index (1–4, lower is better)
The aim was to represent each country’s life‑work balance accurately, reframing the familiar concept of "work‑life balance" to show how businesses in each country care for employee lives and place life before work.
Each metric was assigned an index weight to represent its relative importance, producing a composite score out of 100 for every country. Most indicators were ordered from highest to lowest; exceptions include the healthcare rating, scored out of five (one being best), and both average weekly hours and the safety score, which were ranked from lowest to highest.
Data were extracted and analysed in April 2025.
(*) Where a range was provided, the minimum amount was recorded.